PPN Parameter Dashboard

Theorem 3.6: the ether’s field equation is the Einstein equation, so all 10 post-Newtonian parameters match GR exactly (Eq 3.186). Despite possessing a preferred rest frame, the ether produces no preferred-frame effects in gravitational experiments — the law is covariant even though the solutions are not.

All 10 PPN Parameters (Theorem 3.6, Eq 3.186)

ParameterEtherGRObservational boundExperiment
γ11|γ−1| < 2.3×10⁻⁵Cassini Shapiro delay
β11|β−1| < 8×10⁻⁵Perihelion precession + LLR
ξ00|ξ| < 10⁻³Spin precession
α₁00|α₁| < 10⁻⁴Orbital polarisation
α₂00|α₂| < 10⁻⁷Solar spin alignment
α₃00|α₃| < 4×10⁻²⁰Pulsar spin-down
ζ₁00|ζ₁| < 2×10⁻²Binary pulsar
ζ₂00|ζ₂| < 4×10⁻⁵Binary acceleration
ζ₃00|ζ₃| < 10⁻⁸Newton 3rd law
ζ₄00Linked to other ζ

Why all zeros? The ether’s field equation is the Einstein equation (Theorem 3.5). By Will’s classification theorem, any metric theory with the Einstein equation has all 10 PPN parameters equal to their GR values. The preferred-frame parameters vanish because the law is covariant — the preferred frame is a property of the state, not the equation.

Classical Tests of Gravity

TestEquationEther predictionObservationDepends on
Mercury perihelion precessionEq 3.18443.00 arcsec/century42.98 ± 0.04 arcsec/centuryβ, γ
Solar limb light bendingEq 3.1831.7517 arcsec1.7512 ± 0.0002 arcsecγ
Shapiro time delay (Cassini)Eq 3.182γ = 1 → (1+γ) = 2|γ−1| < 2.3×10⁻⁵γ
Nordtvedt effect (SEP)4β − γ − 30 (exact)|η| < 5.6×10⁻³β, γ

Momentum Conservation

ζ1 = ζ2 = ζ3 = ζ4 = 0

GW carries momentum; the ether transmits it via §3.7 mechanism

Strong Equivalence

4β − γ − 3 = 0

Gravitational binding energy gravitates identically to all other energy

No Preferred Frame

α1 = α2 = α3 = 0

Despite ether rest frame, field equation is covariant (§3.12.7)

Numerical Verification

Mercury precession = 42.98 arcsec/century (Eq 3.184)(got 43.0018, err 0.05%)
Solar limb bending = 1.751 arcsec (Eq 3.183)(got 1.7517, err 0.04%)
Nordtvedt η = 0 (SEP, β=γ=1)(got 0.0000, err 0.00%)
Shapiro delay formula (R=R☉): consistent with (1+γ)GM/c³ scaling(got 123.6590, err 0.00%)

Beta Tools are under active development. Equations are verified against the monograph but outputs may be refined. Report an issue

The monograph is free. The theorems are public. The predictions are precise. The only thing missing is you.

Share: